Exiting Gracefully? Lessons on De-Implementing State-Appointed Governance from Literature and Stakeholder Perspectives in Missouri

By: Evan Rhinesmith, Ph.D.; Olivia Marcucci, Ph.D.; Kelly M. Harris, Ph.D. CCC-SLP; Aaron Park, Kathryn Coleman, Tory Christian, & Gary W. Ritter, Ph.D.

The state of Missouri will soon consider transitioning back from state-appointed governance to locally elected boards in two districts in the St. Louis metropolitan area, having already done so in another. The PRiME Center reviewed the literature to find evidence-based strategies for successful transitions to local governance, as well as conducted an empirical study investigating stakeholders’ perspectives on appropriate strategies to exit state-appointed governance in Missouri school districts. The data were collected via interviews and focus groups from diverse stakeholder groups, including appointed and elected board members, administrators, educators, and parents (n=33). Thematic, emergent analysis revealed several main takeaways.

Key Points:

  • Our deep review of the existing evidence uncovered no clear guidelines from research or practice on how to successfully exit a state intervention.

  • State intervention has often led to improved financial stability in affected districts but has rarely led to sustained academic improvement in these districts.

  • Setting reasonable expectations for exit conditions, ideally aligned with the rationale for entry, can ease the transition back to local governance (ideally aligned with the rationale for entry).

  • More generally, early outreach and robust community engagement with clear and consistent communication between state officials and local community members is necessary for a smooth transition back to local governance.

  • Sudden transitions between appointed to elected boards are problematic.

  • There is a need for targeted and on-going training of board members.

Cultivating a culture of high-quality candidates for school boards may ease exit strategy concerns and may prevent future intervention.

Please Cite As: Rhinesmith, E., Marcucci, O., Harris, K., Park, A., Coleman, K., Christian, T., & Ritter, G. (2022). Exiting Gracefully? Lessons on De-Implementing State-Appointed Governance from Literature and Stakeholder Perspectives in Missouri. Policy Research in Missouri Education, 4(13). Saint Louis University. https://www.sluprime.org/education-reports-database/dese-intervention

 

This work was supported by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

 
 
 
Previous
Previous

Missouri Students' Postsecondary Access Report

Next
Next

Beating the Odds: Student Growth in Missouri's High Poverty Schools